I have a great pleasure to be able to listen to a quality recording from 2001 that surfarced years after the tour ended. Does it harms Mark each time I put these illegal recordings in my player and enjoy the sound of them?
Who I should thank for withdrawing the official 2001 live and keep me out from having a great time again and again all these years?
Now that I can enjoy at last a sbd feed from that tour should I feel guilty because it comes from an un-authorized source?

If the 2008 recordings ends in closed boxes or if we get again an "OTN like" recording, who among us will be still agreeing that nobody cacth the IEM feed and share it? Who will pretends not wanting it because it is again Mark's wish? We do not intend to harm the band but when time comes to get something we can not get otherwise, hard to resist.

Stealth recording exists since recorder exists.
Whether audinece recording are allowed or not, if IEM transmission are not well secured they will be captured anyway.
And we fans will be looking after these unless we find an acceptable alternative.

The answer to prevent illegal recording is to put official ones out on the market, complete and uncut.
Crowfly was a mess but other bands like Pearl Jam, Genesis, The Allman Brothers Band, The Who, Gove And Mule to name a few proved that it is possible to make their fan happy ones...